Issue Details (XML | Word | Printable)

Key: MULE-12
Type: Improvement Improvement
Status: Closed Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: Minor Minor
Assignee: Ross Mason
Reporter: Ross Mason
Votes: 0
Watchers: 0
Operations

If you were logged in you would be able to see more operations.
Mule

Make it easier to plug in custom instances of the MuleManager

Created: 26/Mar/04 01:55 AM   Updated: 21/Aug/06 09:22 PM
Component/s: Core: Configuration
Affects Version/s: 0.8
Fix Version/s: 0.9-beta1

Time Tracking:
Not Specified

Labels:
Similar Issues:


 Description  « Hide
I think the simplest was of doing this is by using the new SPI support to allow the user to define their UMOManager implementation as a service property in the System.Properties or services propery file on the classpath or in meta-inf/services.

 All   Comments   Work Log   Change History   Transitions   FishEye      Sort Order: Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
Ross Mason added a comment - 26/Mar/04 02:54 AM
You can now set the org.mule.umo.UMOManager property to a FQ class that is your UMOManager implmentation in a services property file or on the System.properties. Note that any implementations must have a default constructor.