Mule
  1. Mule
  2. MULE-3244

Component configuration directly on model is not-ideal, confusing and is not extensible.

    Details

    • User impact:
      Medium
    • Effort points:
      3
    • Similar Issues:
      MULE-8858Rename the metamodel classes adding the Model suffix
      MULE-9475Allow config level components in the Extensions API
      MULE-1995Should be able to lookup a Component directly from the Registry
      MULE-9246SDK: Extend IllegalModelDefinitionException to be more specific when validating the Extension model
      MULE-9436Define deployment model for extensions
      MULE-1678Streaming Model Re-Dispatching Empty Streams
      MULE-8920Remove hot swap of extension models
      MULE-9412Add the concept of DataSense to the extension model
      MULE-2742Direct model for 2.0?
      MULE-9413Support validations for MetaData properties in the extension model

      Issue Links

        Activity

        Hide
        Daniel Feist added a comment -

        This issue needs discussion before we can work on this.

        Show
        Daniel Feist added a comment - This issue needs discussion before we can work on this.
        Hide
        Steven Camina added a comment -

        Closing this issue because it affects a very old version of Mule. Please reopen if this is an issue.

        Show
        Steven Camina added a comment - Closing this issue because it affects a very old version of Mule. Please reopen if this is an issue.

          People

          • Assignee:
            Steven Camina
            Reporter:
            Daniel Feist
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

              Development