Mule
  1. Mule
  2. MULE-3244

Component configuration directly on model is not-ideal, confusing and is not extensible.

    Details

    • User impact:
      Medium
    • Effort points:
      3
    • Similar Issues:
      MULE-1995Should be able to lookup a Component directly from the Registry
      MULE-1678Streaming Model Re-Dispatching Empty Streams
      MULE-7715Support XML definition of Beans in extensions configurations
      MULE-8753Give the Extension model the concept of vendor
      MULE-2742Direct model for 2.0?
      MULE-7863Spike on Extensions API execution model - Part 1
      MULE-1752Implciit setting of streaming type when using streaming model
      MULE-8067Decouple the extension-api from the concept of declaring or acting classes
      MULE-2264Spring configuration for embedding a Mule Application
      MULE-2060<mule:component> should ideally be able to reference a standard Spring Factory bean

      Activity

      Hide
      Daniel Feist added a comment -

      This issue needs discussion before we can work on this.

      Show
      Daniel Feist added a comment - This issue needs discussion before we can work on this.
      Hide
      Steven Camina added a comment -

      Closing this issue because it affects a very old version of Mule. Please reopen if this is an issue.

      Show
      Steven Camina added a comment - Closing this issue because it affects a very old version of Mule. Please reopen if this is an issue.

        People

        • Assignee:
          Steven Camina
          Reporter:
          Daniel Feist
        • Votes:
          0 Vote for this issue
          Watchers:
          1 Start watching this issue

          Dates

          • Created:
            Updated:
            Resolved:

            Development